The Trademark Spectrum of Distinctiveness: Is your brand name a superstar or sidekick?

Timeline of trademark distinctiveness examples

Why did the suggestive trademark go to therapy? Because it had a hard time getting people to understand its deeper meaning!

All joking aside, trademark distinctiveness is critical for any business looking to secure a strong, protectable brand identity. When it comes to trademarks, not all brand names are created equal and the ability of a name to be protected through trademark law often depends on where it falls within the spectrum of distinctiveness. Ranging from very distinctive to not at all, let’s take a deeper look into the five labels on the distinctiveness spectrum.

  1. Fanciful Marks: These are the superstars of the trademark world. Think of them as your favorite global superstar like Madonna or Britney Spears. Names with no prior meaning that were created purely to represent a brand. Examples include "Xerox" and "Kodak." Because these marks are unique and “super” distinct, they’re the easiest to protect.

  2. Arbitrary Marks: Simply put, arbitrary trademarks use common words in an unrelated context. Apple is a perfect example. It’s a common word, but it becomes distinctive when used to sell computers. Arbitrary marks are also highly protectable because there’s no direct connection between the word and the product.

  3. Suggestive Marks: These marks require more thought to connect with the product or service. Think “Netflix” (suggesting movies on the internet) or “Airbus” (suggesting a big plane). They’re distinctive enough to be protectable, but they aren’t as instantly unique as fanciful or arbitrary marks.

  4. Descriptive Marks: Descriptive marks directly describe a feature or quality of the product—like “Cold and Creamy” for an ice cream shop. They aren’t inherently distinctive and usually require proof of a secondary meaning (consumer association) to be protectable.

  5. Generic Marks: These are the sidekicks that can’t quite make it to superstar status. Generic terms, like “computer” for a computer brand, are not legally protectable. Why? Because we need these words to describe the actual products or services. Think of words such as “aspirin” or “tissues.”

So, why does this matter? The more distinctive your trademark, the stronger the protection it can garner in a competitive marketplace. Aiming to choose a brand name that falls in the fanciful, arbitrary, or suggestive trademark categories to ensure it’s a superstar that can stand up to global challenges—unlike our descriptive friend who’s still working on that deeper meaning!

Choosing the right trademark is no joke, but understanding this spectrum can make all the difference in protecting your global brand identity!

To learn more about our naming and branding services, visit our services page here. To speak with one of our naming and branding experts, contact us.

Previous
Previous

The First Letter of Drug Names: Exploring Popularity by Alphabet

Next
Next

Impactful Brand Refresh: is the time for Optimization now?